It is not appropriate to map the primary component in each polygon, since this component will not necessarily share the dominant attribute of the polygon. Choropleth mapping of the primary component will produce deceptive results! The following table is used to illustrate this point.
| Polygon (SL) |
Component (CMP) |
Percent Occurrence |
Soil Development (DEVEL) |
...other attributes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 40 | Brown Solonetzic | |
| 2 | 30 | Brown Chernozemic | ||
| 3 | 30 | Brown Chernozemic | ||
| 2 | 1 | 75 | Regosolic | |
| 2 | 25 | Brown Chernozemic |
If the first (highest percentage) component is used to map soil development, "Brown Solonetzic" will be shown in polygon 1, whereas "Brown Chernozemic" covers a larger percentage of the polygon.
To correctly map data in the Component Table, the percent occurrence field must be summarized by the values of the relevant field, as shown in Table 2.
| Polygon (SL) |
Percent Occurrence |
Soil Development (DEVEL) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | Brown Chernozemic |
| 1 | 40 | Brown Solonetzic |
| 2 | 75 | Regosolic |
| 2 | 25 | Brown Chernozemic |
There are two ways in which this data can be mapped:
| Polygon (SL) |
Percent Occurrence |
Soil Development (DEVEL) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | Brown Chernozemic |
| 2 | 75 | Regosolic |
| Polygon (SL) |
Percent Occurrence |
Soil Development (DEVEL) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | Brown Chernozemic |
| 2 | 25 | Brown Chernozemic |